Marybeth Schaeffer is NOT Chana. Although she posted on Chana's blog, and filled in for her sometimes....

Marybeth is not Chana.  Marybeth IS insintel. Marybeth is Heidi Brooks.  But Marybeth is NOT Chana.

Marybeth did post on Chana's blog on occasion.  Sometimes she was guest poster, other times she was MB.  And a couple of times she logged in as "truth teller" to post for Chana, when Chana was unable to tend to the blog.  But Marybeth is not the Chana who started the blog and Marybeth is not the Chana who appeared on Facebook.

Just as I used linguistics to exclude Tracey Herold from being Chana, I used them to exclude Marybeth. Linguistics analysis provides the answer to who the real Chana is, as well as who the real Chana isn't.  Marybeth has a habit of posting with double-dot elipsis followed by triple-dot elipsis.  And Marybeth doesn't use the same catch phrases as Chana does.  Therefore, she's not Chana.

A recent study at Concordia University proved that anonymous authors on the internet or through email can be identified by their vocabulary idiosyncrasies.  The method relies on pulling out the commonalities, and then looking at the things that are different to eliminate authors.  Scientists at Concordia applied their method to hundreds of thousands of Enron emails, and were able to identify authors with 90% accuracy.  The method is so accurate that it's going to be used in court cases in the future.

The same technique can be applied to the circle of people involved in the sphere of internet strife surrounding the Kyron Horman cases.  When you pull out all of the common stuff used by various people and then focus on what is uncommon - used by only two characters - it's so easy to match up personalities to people.

I have done this exact thing, and I am confident that I have found who Chana really is.  I'll update later tonight, once the evidence is assembled.