Ding dong the witch is dead, which 'ole witch, the wicked witch. Ding dong the wicked witch is dead! Something tells me this is not Kansas and she is not dead! She'll be baaack! Holla!
She and her blue monkey Judy will be back. That's ok. We won't stop watching. What she does to people is disgusting and will be monitored closely, both on pages she creates and inside her profile.
It seems more likely to me that she unpublished the page for Easter weekend. What makes me think so is that her Tracey Herold page and the Circle of Shame page are both missing. Maybe she's leaving for the weekend and she doesn't want anyone fooling with her pages while she's not around to delete or respond. She started with disabling her Tracey Herold page and then followed with the Circle of Shame page. Now she doesn't have to stand guard herself or add any admins to babysit. That's my guess, for what it's worth. It's too soon to celebrate, but like scamgirladmin said, we'll be there if and when they rise again.
How do you know this, scamgirladmin? Are you even more omniscient than we've been led to believe? Or do you have "inside information"? If so, can you divulge your source? Please, just a little hint??
Well, that could be, Anonymous. However, it might be a more compelling hypothesis if scamgirl's page had not been deleted by Facebook last week along with about half a dozen fake profiles. First, I would think that scamgirl would know how to skirt the terms of service so as to avoid violation. Secondly, I would hope that Facebook might give one of its own some warning. But you could very well be right.
Interestingly, I've always been under the assumption that you could tell when a page had been deleted because it would no longer come up in searches. Apparently, this is not true. Pages that have been unpublished by their owners do not come up once the browser cache is cleared IF the profile conducting the search had not liked the page before its removal. Since I had not liked Terri Horman's Circle of Shame before its disappearance, the fact that it fails to come up when I search is no assurance that it has been deleted. More's the pity. I would very much like to believe that scamgirl is correct.
Who does own the shame page, if I might ask? It always seemed like Tracey's baby. She was the main person who posted there. In fact, oftentimes she was the ONLY person posting there. Regardless, knowing that she is not the administrator does not tell us whether the page was unpublished or deleted.
that is if he is even real. could very well be just another fake profie of socals. if not she has him very well trained. must have potty trained him with big girl panties using a bungie cord for a belt
ok so lets see, she is down 2 brothers and a mother. yet "her parents" dogs always..blah blah sorry she has to go, her brother just stopped in. catch ya on the flip......
I remember that Tom posted a little blurb about his brother's business up in Washington back before Christmas. I think it was a chocolate shop. I'd probably recognize the name (and certainly the photo) if I saw it again, but I can't think of it off the top of my head. I'll go do some investigating, and if I come up with anything, I'll let you know. Seems to me that Tom's sister-in-law (his brother's wife) played a big part in running the business. And I remember Tom making a good-natured jab about how his brother refused to comp him any of his fancy chocolates. Maybe it was all in aid of appearing legit, but I was (and still am) fairly convinced.
Yes, that's it, Anonymous. I just sent that link and some additional info to Scam Girl. The photo on the website is pretty much what I remember drooling over, and the owner's name is the one I recall from the article (Tom's sister-in-law). Makes a case for Tom's authenticity. Great question by Anonymous above you: why is Tom throwing his lot in with these deviants? At a certain point, he seemed to be withdrawing from all the games and antics. But, maybe that was just to pull strings from behind the scenes...? For cryin' out loud, how many freakin' puppetmasters have we GOT here, anyway??
Right. Why in the world would he want to own the circle of shame page? Why would he want his name associated with all the negative stuff going on over there? He seems very peaceful on the surface.
There is a Tom Jones that is a mobile auto glass repairman. You can easily find his advertisement on the internet. The question is whether TJ was/is the REAL Tom Jones or just another of Tamara's, MB's, and Tracey's lies. Someone needs to call his actual mobile auto glass shop and talk to the real Tom Jones. Don't call the numbers TJ gives out on SoCal's forum.
Yes, I agree. I can remember a time when Tom admitted that one of the tricks the insiders had been playing (generating a false rumor) was not terribly ethical. It certainly sounded to me as if he had a conscience. His PUBLIC participation really tailed off after that. But I've seen some posts he's made since then that sounded full of childish spite. So I know he's not all sweetness and light.
Owning the Circle of Shame page, however, seems entirely beyond the pale. If that's the case, it means he's still firmly backing Tracey. And how does someone with a conscience, someone who's supposedly a "good Christian," reconcile doing THAT?! If it's true, it alters my opinion of him drastically. But if it's true, maybe he shut the page down when he'd decided he'd seen ENOUGH. Better late than never, I guess. :-/
ok last time, face book shut down both pages and tracey just today has deactivated her profile. being the mentality that she has or lacks, i think she thinks she can hide. the shits hitting the fan. most likely she will only be able to return as a fake profile. isnt that IFUCKINGRONIC:)
are you people kiding me? tom lebastard is one of the most active posters on socals little private boards and still is. hes like another escalante, has everyone fooled.
Nope, not surprised either. Like I said, the few posts Tom LeMaster made on the Circle of Shame page were full of petty hatred and childish spite. He started the Good vs. Evil secret group and the inner groups within that group in order to be able to post without fear of reprisal. That right there is his chickenshit signature. It doesn't surprise me at all that he's active in other small private groups. He's a small man, and that's one way to be a big fish. He seems to enjoy the freedom afforded by secrecy.
Yes, what was he going to do with those pieces of information? Is it just a case of "knowledge is power"? Or was he planning to use those addresses and e-mails for a specific purpose - maybe something a little more illicit than sending Christmas cards? Perhaps he was collecting info to offer in trade, to use as a bargaining chip for other pieces of info or to make himself a bigger player in the game. Maybe he hoped to leverage himself a place in the insider's inside circle. Hmmm. Possibilities are endless.
Na na na na, hey hey, goodbye.
ReplyDeleteShe is a disgrace to humanity.
Wow, even 4chan is onto this now? Lookout!
ReplyDeleteLooks like Tracey and Judy have no place to post anymore! Bwahahaha! Banned everywhere else!
ReplyDeleteIf scam girl can't get Tracey's complete personal info, 4chan will for sure. I would be a little worried if I were her right now. No, a LOT worried.
ReplyDeleteI've got it, but I'm not going to use it. That would be stalking, and I'm not a stalker. I can't speak for 4chan, though.
ReplyDeleteDing dong the witch is dead, which 'ole witch, the wicked witch. Ding dong the wicked witch is dead! Something tells me this is not Kansas and she is not dead! She'll be baaack! Holla!
ReplyDeleteShe and her blue monkey Judy will be back. That's ok. We won't stop watching. What she does to people is disgusting and will be monitored closely, both on pages she creates and inside her profile.
ReplyDeleteLike! +1 +1 +1!!
ReplyDeleteIt seems more likely to me that she unpublished the page for Easter weekend. What makes me think so is that her Tracey Herold page and the Circle of Shame page are both missing. Maybe she's leaving for the weekend and she doesn't want anyone fooling with her pages while she's not around to delete or respond. She started with disabling her Tracey Herold page and then followed with the Circle of Shame page. Now she doesn't have to stand guard herself or add any admins to babysit. That's my guess, for what it's worth. It's too soon to celebrate, but like scamgirladmin said, we'll be there if and when they rise again.
ReplyDeleteI can guarantee you that it was not disabled. It was deleted.
ReplyDeleteHow do you know this, scamgirladmin? Are you even more omniscient than we've been led to believe? Or do you have "inside information"? If so, can you divulge your source? Please, just a little hint??
ReplyDeleteMaybe scamgirl works for facebook?
ReplyDeletetracey does not own the shame page, nor does she administrate on it. she can not disable it.
ReplyDeleteWell, that could be, Anonymous. However, it might be a more compelling hypothesis if scamgirl's page had not been deleted by Facebook last week along with about half a dozen fake profiles. First, I would think that scamgirl would know how to skirt the terms of service so as to avoid violation. Secondly, I would hope that Facebook might give one of its own some warning. But you could very well be right.
ReplyDeleteInterestingly, I've always been under the assumption that you could tell when a page had been deleted because it would no longer come up in searches. Apparently, this is not true. Pages that have been unpublished by their owners do not come up once the browser cache is cleared IF the profile conducting the search had not liked the page before its removal. Since I had not liked Terri Horman's Circle of Shame before its disappearance, the fact that it fails to come up when I search is no assurance that it has been deleted. More's the pity. I would very much like to believe that scamgirl is correct.
Who does own it? MB?
ReplyDeleteWho does own the shame page, if I might ask? It always seemed like Tracey's baby. She was the main person who posted there. In fact, oftentimes she was the ONLY person posting there. Regardless, knowing that she is not the administrator does not tell us whether the page was unpublished or deleted.
ReplyDeleteTom LeMaster owner. Sheri Escalante Admin.
ReplyDeletewho is Tom???? I mean what part does HE play in all of this???
ReplyDeletemore than most know, thats for sure.
ReplyDeletewell, besides the creeps he runs with.
that is if he is even real. could very well be just another fake profie of socals.
ReplyDeleteif not she has him very well trained.
must have potty trained him with big girl panties using a bungie cord for a belt
supposedly he has a brother in Washington or Oregon. Anyone have any ss of his friends?
ReplyDeleteI think he is another one of socal's profiles. An old one she set up a while ago for one of her prior scams.
ReplyDeletemakes sense. then she could easily add a brother. Anyone remember the brother's name and where he lived?
ReplyDeletewell shes down 2, so i guess she could use another. oh ~~tears~~ ~~blurry screen~~
ReplyDeleteok so lets see, she is down 2 brothers
ReplyDeleteand a mother.
yet "her parents" dogs always..blah blah
sorry she has to go,
her brother just stopped in.
catch ya on the flip......
You guys are a riot. You Have socal down pat.
ReplyDeletethat is a FACT...so take it with a grain of salt and see what shakes out.
ReplyDeletei must ask, how do those to go together?
How do what go together?
ReplyDeletefact:: something that has really occurred or is the case"
ReplyDeletetake with grain of salt::used when it is needed to show that intelligence and personal judgment are needed,
I remember that Tom posted a little blurb about his brother's business up in Washington back before Christmas. I think it was a chocolate shop. I'd probably recognize the name (and certainly the photo) if I saw it again, but I can't think of it off the top of my head. I'll go do some investigating, and if I come up with anything, I'll let you know. Seems to me that Tom's sister-in-law (his brother's wife) played a big part in running the business. And I remember Tom making a good-natured jab about how his brother refused to comp him any of his fancy chocolates. Maybe it was all in aid of appearing legit, but I was (and still am) fairly convinced.
ReplyDeleteTom seems like a nice guy. So why is he aiding and protecting the scam artist?
ReplyDeleteIs this it by chance?
ReplyDeletehttp://porttownsendchocolatecompany.com/contact
Yes, that's it, Anonymous. I just sent that link and some additional info to Scam Girl. The photo on the website is pretty much what I remember drooling over, and the owner's name is the one I recall from the article (Tom's sister-in-law). Makes a case for Tom's authenticity. Great question by Anonymous above you: why is Tom throwing his lot in with these deviants? At a certain point, he seemed to be withdrawing from all the games and antics. But, maybe that was just to pull strings from behind the scenes...? For cryin' out loud, how many freakin' puppetmasters have we GOT here, anyway??
ReplyDeleteRight. Why in the world would he want to own the circle of shame page? Why would he want his name associated with all the negative stuff going on over there? He seems very peaceful on the surface.
ReplyDeleteThere is a Tom Jones that is a mobile auto glass repairman. You can easily find his advertisement on the internet. The question is whether TJ was/is the REAL Tom Jones or just another of Tamara's, MB's, and Tracey's lies. Someone needs to call his actual mobile auto glass shop and talk to the real Tom Jones. Don't call the numbers TJ gives out on SoCal's forum.
ReplyDeleteYes, I agree. I can remember a time when Tom admitted that one of the tricks the insiders had been playing (generating a false rumor) was not terribly ethical. It certainly sounded to me as if he had a conscience. His PUBLIC participation really tailed off after that. But I've seen some posts he's made since then that sounded full of childish spite. So I know he's not all sweetness and light.
ReplyDeleteOwning the Circle of Shame page, however, seems entirely beyond the pale. If that's the case, it means he's still firmly backing Tracey. And how does someone with a conscience, someone who's supposedly a "good Christian," reconcile doing THAT?! If it's true, it alters my opinion of him drastically. But if it's true, maybe he shut the page down when he'd decided he'd seen ENOUGH. Better late than never, I guess. :-/
The post above is referring to Tom LeMaster, not Tom Jones. Just a little confusing when we're all "Anonymous," LOL.
ReplyDeleteok last time, face book shut down both pages and tracey just today has deactivated her profile. being the mentality that she has or lacks, i think she thinks she can hide. the shits hitting the fan. most likely she will only be able to return as a fake profile.
ReplyDeleteisnt that IFUCKINGRONIC:)
are you people kiding me? tom lebastard is one of the most active posters on socals little private boards and still is. hes like another escalante, has everyone fooled.
ReplyDeleteI guess I should not be surprised. How is socal explaining all this?
ReplyDeletein the old days they called it
ReplyDelete"through her teeth"
Nope, not surprised either. Like I said, the few posts Tom LeMaster made on the Circle of Shame page were full of petty hatred and childish spite. He started the Good vs. Evil secret group and the inner groups within that group in order to be able to post without fear of reprisal. That right there is his chickenshit signature. It doesn't surprise me at all that he's active in other small private groups. He's a small man, and that's one way to be a big fish. He seems to enjoy the freedom afforded by secrecy.
ReplyDeleteHe got people' private addreeses and emails. Why?
ReplyDeleteYes, what was he going to do with those pieces of information? Is it just a case of "knowledge is power"? Or was he planning to use those addresses and e-mails for a specific purpose - maybe something a little more illicit than sending Christmas cards? Perhaps he was collecting info to offer in trade, to use as a bargaining chip for other pieces of info or to make himself a bigger player in the game. Maybe he hoped to leverage himself a place in the insider's inside circle. Hmmm. Possibilities are endless.
ReplyDelete