So you go to your attorney....

And you say: "I want to sue mean people on the internet."

Attorney responds: "Where are people being mean to you on the internet?"

Says you: "On the Scam Girl Blog and Facebook."

Attorney looks at the blog and facebook for five or ten minutes, says: "Is any of this true? You have to tell me if it's true or not, because I don't want to look like a doof in depositions, and my filing suit opens you to countersuit. How did this situation begin?"

Says you: "It doesn't matter if it's true, or what I did wrong. People are mean to me on the internet."

You leave the office, and attorney promptly initiates a conference call with several of his friends in your town, and they guffaw about the idiot who just left his office, who wants to sue mean people on the internet.

Unfazed, you go to the police department.

Says you: "I want to press charges against people stalking me on the internet."

Investigator says: "Did you initiate contact, or did they?"

Says you: "Oh, there's been no contact. They haven't contacted me. But they were mean to me."

Says investigator: "You can't press internet stalking charges against someone if they've made no contact with you or your family members. So tell me what happened?"

Uh oh.  This one's a dilemma. Do you tell the investigator what happened, from the beginning, or do you lie, hoping that the truth won't come out?  You decide for once to tell the truth - at least pieces of it.

Says investigator, after reading your statement: "So you're saying you pretended to be a rock star, surfer, and judge on the net, and people found out and blogged that you're none of these? Sorry, but that's not stalking."

Says you: "But I have their IPs, from when they visited my forum that I invited them to join!"

Investigator: "You invited them? Are you serious?"

Says you: "Yeah, and I give updates on my twitter of where my new forums are, when my old ones are shut down for TOS violations."

Investigator: "Um, lady, maybe I can arrange for some help for you with the local mental health center."

Dejected, you leave the PD.  After you're out of earshot, the investigator calls in several of his fellow officers, and says, "You're never going to believe what she just wanted...."

Scam Girl's 10 Commandments of the World Wide Web:

1) Thou shalt trust no one on the internet.

2) Thou shalt not post thy name, email address, thy children's photos, nor any personally identifying information on the internet.

3) Thou shalt not ogle naked people, nor shalt thou post pics of thy naked body, nor thy ex's naked body, nor any naked body.

4) Thou shalt not troll on the sabbath without triple proxy.

5) Thou shalt remember the off button and use it frequently, for those that thou begat will appreciate a homecooked meal on occasion.

6) Thou shalt admit defeat when decisively defeated, for butthurtness is an abomination.

7) Thou shall not IM thy neighbor's spouse, for holy matrimony does not cease when the coveting is pixelated.

8) Thou shalt not bear false witness about thy career, whether imaginary rock star, surfer, judge, or law enforcement officer.

9) Thou shalt not invoke 4chan, Anonymous, /b/tards, nor any other internet warror society, lest thy warrior society consider thy actions newfaggotry.

10) Thou shalt not sayeth nuff said, methinks, folks, or just saying. For condescension is an abomination in the eyes of the web.

Saturday Hodgepodge of Hilarity

Junk from Saturday, April 30, which requires no explanation. Except to say that you can't claim stalking if you're the one who fired the opening volley (Chana, Marybeth, SoCal, Tracey), or if you're the retard that continues to post on the "stalker" page (Judy), all the while screaming "quit stalking me!" .

Personally, I'm proud that I've expanded Judy's narrow vocabulary with the word "butthurt," though she needs to learn to use it properly. 

So here's the Saturday hodgepodge:

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

 ______________________________________

 _______________________________________

________________________________________

It's like talking to a simpleminded three year old.

You can tell a three year old that fire is bad, so don't touch.  And the three year old will remove his hand from the flame.

Judy Day, though - even though she should know that it's best for her to shut up and go away, she's still typing in an internet frenzy.  "LMFAO!!!"  "My lawyer takes screenshots!!!" "$$$$ speaks baby."

A simpleton fucktard whose cover is blown and she's too stupid to do what's best for her and her family.  Something akin to a blathering tasmanian devil which whirls around the internet with its incessant grunting and spazzing, forgetting today what it belched out yesterday.

Judy claims now to have no knowledge of who Mardon Day is.  Why she wouldn't remember the name of the man who fathered her children is not my worry.  That's something I really don't want to ponder.

Here's a refresher, Judy.  He's the man that you called a deadbeat on some stupid page about ex husbands:

LINK

Judith Lynn Braga Day, 40, is not Ralph Painter's niece.

She claims, though, that she's "boinking" someone in law enforcement:

Judy's not "boinking" anyone in law enforcement, unless she's doing it on the side. She's shacking up in an apartment in Oregon City with a taxi driver named Brien, who seems like a nice enough guy, but he's no law enforcement officer.

Judy's twitter is connected to Brien's twitter is connected to Brien's work twitter:

So Brien is a cab driver. No shame in that.  But he's certainly not a law enforcement officer, and probably never will be, because the basic training for law enforcement officers is physically strenuous, and at 46, I don't think that Brien's up to it. (I'll remove Brien's info tomorrow - he really does seem like a decent fellow.)

Judy seems like a law enforcement junkie. You know the type.  She probably has a scanner on her kitchen table just to feel like she's involved and important.  That's probably why she claimed to be Ralph Painter's niece, too.

Judy has two kids, B and A.  Judy's ex husband, the father or her kids, isn't too wild about her, though:

No photos of Judy are available, though I'm not surprised. Obese people usually don't like to share their photos, and instead post stuff like the Smurfs or Tinkerbell or whatever for their profile pics.

This should end the questions of whether or not Judy told the truth when she said she was the niece of Ralph Painter.

(As always, everything I post is available on the public internet and placed there by the people in the articles I write about.  And, as always, I repeat: if you're going to bully people on the internet, you'd better check your internet history first.)

You asked for screenshots, Judy. Here they are.

 
Here's where you commented on the Columbia County Sheriff's Department page within one minute of them sharing their condolences to Chief Painter's Family:

LINK

Here's a cache of your comment, with you using a Ralph Painter funeral procession photo as your profile pic:

LINK

And the original photo of Chief Painter's procession from which you made your profile pic:

LINK

Oooh look, another comment of yours on a tribute for Ralph Painter:

LINK

Yet now you deny saying that Ralph Painter was your uncle, and instead you say that one of the other officers to have fallen in 2011 is your uncle instead of Ralph Painter, as you've claimed since January.  In real life, when you talk bullshit, do people really act like they believe you? Because you're so easy to see through on the internet.

________________________________________________

(My condolences to the Painter family, as well as my sincerest apology that some troll named "Judy Day" has attempted to bring your family into her demented Facebook games. If by some chance "Judy Day" really is a family member, I hope that you will get her some help. She is obviously mentally ill.)

________________________________________________

Somewhere in Washington, a nice lady named Chana was accused by Tracey Herold of being the Chana in the FB mess.

Another of Tracey Herold's lies.  After I revealed that Chana is SoCal is Tamara Merrill, Tracey went on a mission to convince people that I was wrong, that Chana was a lady living in Washington with a Guinea Pig named Yum Yum. In my opinion, Tracey victimized a very nice lady who has been homeless, who has had a brain injury, and who is benevolent enough to care for small animals.  Certainly doesn't sound like the Chana of FB and Blogspot fame, does it?

Someone contacted the Chana from Washington and informed her that she was being pulled into this mess by Tracey Herold.  The Washington Chana replied as such:

And then she posted this today:

 The Judy Day alt appeared, and commented in the FB thread discussing this:

Just like Tracey, Judy threatens to involve law enforcement. (At least she's no longer claiming to be a federal investigator.) Just like Tracey, she avoids the topic at hand.

For Tracey Herold to involve an innocent woman recuperating from a brain injury, generous enough to give her time to small animals with their own health issues - well, that's pretty deplorable.

How low will you sink, Tracey Herold?  Who will you pull into your tempest next? Why are you so invested in protecting Chana/SoCal/Tamara Merrill? What does Tamara have on YOU?